Abstract
ABSTRACT Selective isolation of coal tar bases was performed by using two different separation methods: liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and column liquid chromatography (CLC). Two cuts, A (boiling range 100°C – 230°C) and B (boiling range 230°C – 300°C), obtained by distillation of “Mina do Leao” coal tar oil, are compared after the isolation of bases by both methods through elemental analysis, infra-red spectroscopy and mass yield. In addition, cut A and its bases generated by both LLE and CLC were investigated by GC/MS. Pyridines, quinolines and anilines are the major classes found in the base fractions obtained by both methods. Although both showed to be equally selective for base isolation, the column liquid chromatography method demonstrated better recovery.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
