Abstract

To test potential parallels between hippocampal and anterior thalamic function, rats with anterior thalamic lesions were trained on a series of biconditional learning tasks. The anterior thalamic lesions did not disrupt learning two biconditional associations in operant chambers where a specific auditory stimulus (tone or click) had a differential outcome depending on whether it was paired with a particular visual context (spot or checkered wall-paper) or a particular thermal context (warm or cool). Likewise, rats with anterior thalamic lesions successfully learnt a biconditional task when they were reinforced for digging in one of two distinct cups (containing either beads or shredded paper), depending on the particular appearance of the local context on which the cup was placed (one of two textured floors). In contrast, the same rats were severely impaired at learning the biconditional rule to select a specific cup when in a particular location within the test room. Place learning was then tested with a series of go/no-go discriminations. Rats with anterior thalamic nuclei lesions could learn to discriminate between two locations when they were approached from a constant direction. They could not, however, use this acquired location information to solve a subsequent spatial biconditional task where those same places dictated the correct choice of digging cup. Anterior thalamic lesions produced a selective, but severe, biconditional learning deficit when the task incorporated distal spatial cues. This deficit mirrors that seen in rats with hippocampal lesions, so extending potential interdependencies between the two sites.

Highlights

  • The rodent anterior thalamic nuclei are thought to be critical for spatial learning by acting in concert with the hippocampus (Sutherland & Rodriguez, 1989; Warburton et al, 2000, 2001; Henry et al, 2004)

  • The present study examined this relationship by comparing the importance of the anterior thalamic nuclei for biconditional learning when that learning involves either proximal contextual cues or more distal spatial cues

  • For the remaining 12 ATNx1 rats the total area of cell loss in the anterior thalamic nuclei was between 52 and 94%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The rodent anterior thalamic nuclei are thought to be critical for spatial learning by acting in concert with the hippocampus (Sutherland & Rodriguez, 1989; Warburton et al, 2000, 2001; Henry et al, 2004). The present study examined this relationship by comparing the importance of the anterior thalamic nuclei for biconditional learning when that learning involves either proximal contextual cues or more distal spatial cues. The rationale arises from the finding that hippocampal lesions can have contrasting effects on biconditional problems involving these same two cue types, with only the latter condition impaired (Coutureau et al, 2002; Sziklas & Petrides, 2002; Dumont et al, 2007; Albasser et al, 2013). One rationale for studying biconditional problems is that they help isolate specific stimulus and specific response combinations involved in learning. This property is highlighted by studies showing that anterior

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call