Selective immunodepression

Abstract

A variety of experimental conditions have been described which can selectively depress various aspects of the normal immune response. Treatment with cytotoxic drugs or variations in the route of administration or physical state of the antigen can selectively depress one immunoglobulin class while allowing normal synthesis of other immunoglobulin classes. Injection of excessive or subimmunogenic doses of antigen, or injection of antigen in a nonimmunogenic form will specifically depress antibody body syntheis to that antigen. Depending upon the antigen dose and other factors discussed above such tolerance can be selectively induced in either the B- or the T-lymphocyte population. Finally, antibody is highly heterogeneous with respect to its affinity for the antigenic determinant. As a consequence of the selective pressure of decreasing antigen concentration there is generally a progressive shift towards the production of high affinity antibodies. Various experimental maneuvers can selectively depress specific subpopulations of antibody forming cells. B-cell tolerance preferentially occurs in high affinity antibody forming cells with a decrease in the average affinity of the residual antibody formed. Passively injected antibody specifically depresses antibody synthesis to concomitantly injected antigen. This antibody mediated immune suppression selectively depresses low affinity antibody synthesis. Thus, a variety of experimental procedures have been discussed which will modify the immune response in highly selected ways. It is clearly important in describing the immune response to specify not merely the amount of antibody formed, but also its class and subclass. In addition, to fully describe the immune response it is necessary to specify the affinity and heterogeneity of the antibody. As discussed above the factors controlling the affinity of serum antibody and the mechanism of antibody mediated immune suppression are reasonably well understood. Much data are available regarding factors determining tolerance induction, however, the detailed cellular mechanisms involved remain obscure. With regard to the mechanisms determining which immunoglobulin classes are formed, and in what proportion, relatively little information is available.