Abstract

Metal oxide nanoparticles (MONPs) are massively produced for various industrial, environmental and biomedical applications due to their high surface reactivity and unique chemical and physical properties. Among all the manufactured MONPs, human exposure to zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles may cause significant health concerns. This leads to a desire for efficient methods for their facile detection in the aqueous environment. In this work, two detection methods and one removal method were developed to selectively detect or remove ZnO nanoparticles in contaminated water with the presence of other MONPs. A detection method based on the fluorescence quenching of meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (TCPP) has been developed to treat water samples containing MONPs. Quenching of the TCPP emission intensity at 650 nm provides a Stern-Volmer plot with adequate sensitivity for the detection of 0.15 mg/mL ZnO nanoparticles. Meanwhile, a unique emission peak at 605 nm is observed and can be used for the identification and quantitation of ZnO nanoparticles down to 0.0015 mg/mL. A removal method using 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) has been proved to sediment ZnO nanoparticles in aqueous suspension with TCPP as a color indicator for ZnO. When 2.0% (v) APTES is applied to treat water samples containing ≥ 0.5 mg/mL of ZnO nanoparticles, a web-like sediment adheres onto the glass vial bottom from APTES-ZnO conjugation. A high removal efficiency of over 99% (w) ZnO nanoparticles was attained using APTES. Another detection method has been developed using electroanalytical analysis by firstly drop-casting MONPs on a screen-printed electrode. When phenol is analyzed as a chemical probe by cyclic voltammetry (CV), measurement of the reduction current provides adequate sensitivity for the indirect quantitation of 0.1 mg/mL ZnO nanoparticles. Both the oxidation peak and charge storage capacity measured from the cyclic voltammogram are proportional to the ZnO nanoparticle concentration and can afford a better detection limit of 0.01 mg/mL. Overall, the above methods are labour and cost effective and can afford high selectivity towards ZnO detection or removal in the presence of other MONPs. Additionally, the electrochemical analysis method and the APTES sedimentation method can differentiate ZnO nanoparticles from Zn2+ and zinc peroxide (ZnO2) nanoparticles.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call