Abstract

A motor imagery (MI) brain-computer interface (BCI) plays an important role in the neurological rehabilitation training for stroke patients. Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based MI BCI has high temporal resolution, which is convenient for real-time BCI control. Therefore, we focus on EEG-based MI BCI in this paper. The identification of MI EEG signals is always quite challenging. Due to high inter-session/subject variability, each subject should spend long and tedious calibration time in collecting amounts of labeled samples for a subject-specific model. To cope with this problem, we present a supervised selective cross-subject transfer learning (sSCSTL) approach which simultaneously makes use of the labeled samples from target and source subjects based on Riemannian tangent space. Since the covariance matrices representing the multi-channel EEG signals belong to the smooth Riemannian manifold, we perform the Riemannian alignment to make the covariance matrices from different subjects close to each other. Then, all aligned covariance matrices are converted into the Riemannian tangent space features to train a classifier in the Euclidean space. To investigate the role of unlabeled samples, we further propose semi-supervised and unsupervised versions which utilize the total samples and unlabeled samples from target subject, respectively. Sequential forward floating search (SFFS) method is executed for source selection. All our proposed algorithms transfer the labeled samples from most suitable source subjects into the feature space of target subject. Experimental results on two publicly available MI datasets demonstrated that our algorithms outperformed several state-of-the-art algorithms using small number of the labeled samples from target subject, especially for good target subjects.

Highlights

  • A motor imagery (MI) brain-computer interface (BCI) has drawn great attention for decades, since it can help a subject directly manipulate an electronic equipment using his brain activity evoked by imagined movements, without the participation of the traditional muscle-dependent pathway (He et al, 2015)

  • The MI dataset from 52 healthy subjects (Cho et al, 2017) and the BCI competition IV dataset 1 (Tangermann et al, 2012) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed methods in MI classification

  • (1) MI dataset from 52 healthy subjects (MI1): 64-channel MI EEG signals from 52 healthy subjects were recorded at a sampling rate of 512 Hz

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A motor imagery (MI) brain-computer interface (BCI) has drawn great attention for decades, since it can help a subject directly manipulate an electronic equipment using his brain activity evoked by imagined movements, without the participation of the traditional muscle-dependent pathway (He et al, 2015). It can help the stroke patients recover their neurological disorders, and. MI EEG signals have higher inter-session/subject variability and fewer categories of BCI tasks than ERP and SSVEP.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call