Selective copper diffusion into quartz-hosted vapor inclusions: Evidence from other host minerals, driving forces, and consequences for Cu–Au ore formation

Abstract

Recent experimental studies have raised concerns that Cu concentrations in quartz-hosted fluid inclusions from magmatic–hydrothermal ore deposits do not represent pristine concentrations in the trapped fluids, but are modified by post-entrapment diffusional exchange through the host quartz. New microanalyses of fluid inclusions hosted in topaz show significantly lower Cu concentrations in vapor inclusions, compared to otherwise identical inclusions hosted by coexisting quartz, whereas coeval brine (hypersaline liquid) inclusions are very similar independent of host mineral in one sample. Sulfur is present as a major component in all vapor inclusions, as in most porphyry-related vapor inclusions, and Cu never exceeds S, but commonly matches the S content at a molar ratio of Cu:S⩽2 in vapor inclusions hosted by quartz.Univalent ions with a radius smaller than ∼1Å are known to diffuse rapidly through the channels of the quartz structure, parallel to its crystallographic c axis. Since only Cu concentrations differ between topaz- and quartz-hosted inclusions, we hypothesize that Cu+ and H+ re-equilibrate by diffusional ion exchange through these channels, while all other element concentrations remain essentially unchanged. A thermodynamic model considering charge-balanced Cu+H+ exchange and diffusive H2 re-equilibration of an initially Cu-poor but S-rich vapor inclusion with a typical rock-buffered fluid environment outside the host crystal demonstrates a strong chemical driving force for Cu+ to migrate from the surrounding rock into the fluid inclusion during cooling of the system. The driving force for Cu diffusion, against the gradient in total Cu concentration, is the abundant H+ liberated inside the inclusion by dissociation of HCl and particularly by the precipitation of CuFeS2 by reaction with the initially trapped H2S and/or SO2. Gold is not only a much larger ion, but is subject to an opposing driving force, suggesting that high concentrations of this larger ion analyzed in vapor inclusions probably represent true gold concentrations in magmatic–hydrothermal vapor.These findings imply that brine–vapor separation in porphyry deposits does not cause selective Cu transfer to the vapor, but is more likely to destabilize Cu complexes and promote copper ore deposition during decompression and unmixing of the two fluid phases. By contrast, Au may be selectively transferred into the vapor phase, allowing its transport through the deeper porphyry copper deposits to form epithermal gold deposits closer to the earth’s surface.