Abstract

BackgroundDental caries is one of the most prevalent non-communicable disease globally and can have serious health sequelae impacting negatively on quality of life. In the UK most adults experience dental caries during their lifetime and the 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey reported that 85% of adults have at least one dental restoration. Conservative removal of tooth tissue for both primary and secondary caries reduces the risk of failure due to tooth-restoration, complex fracture as well as remaining tooth surfaces being less vulnerable to further caries. However, despite its prevalence there is no consensus on how much caries to remove prior to placing a restoration to achieve optimal outcomes. Evidence for selective compared to complete or near-complete caries removal suggests there may be benefits for selective removal in sustaining tooth vitality, therefore avoiding abscess formation and pain, so eliminating the need for more complex and costly treatment or eventual tooth loss. However, the evidence is of low scientific quality and mainly gleaned from studies in primary teeth.MethodThis is a pragmatic, multi-centre, two-arm patient randomised controlled clinical trial including an internal pilot set in primary dental care in Scotland and England. Dental health professionals will recruit 623 participants over 12-years of age with deep carious lesions in their permanent posterior teeth. Participants will have a single tooth randomised to either the selective caries removal or complete caries removal treatment arm. Baseline measures and outcome data (during the 3-year follow-up period) will be assessed through clinical examination, patient questionnaires and NHS databases. A mixed-method process evaluation will complement the clinical and economic outcome evaluation and examine implementation, mechanisms of impact and context. The primary outcome at three years is sustained tooth vitality. The primary economic outcome is net benefit modelled over a lifetime horizon. Clinical secondary outcomes include pulp exposure, progession of caries, restoration failure; as well as patient-centred and economic outcomes.DiscussionSCRiPT will provide evidence for the most clinically effective and cost-beneficial approach to managing deep carious lesions in permanent posterior teeth in primary care. This will support general dental practitioners, patients and policy makers in decision making.Trial Registration Trial registry: ISRCTN. Trial registration number: ISRCTN76503940. Date of Registration: 30.10.2019. URL of trial registry record: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN76503940?q=ISRCTN76503940%20&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=1&page=1&pageSize=10&searchType=basic-search.

Highlights

  • Dental caries is one of the most prevalent non-communicable disease globally and can have serious health sequelae impacting negatively on quality of life

  • The removal of less tooth tissue for both primary and secondary caries reduces the risk of failure due to tooth-restoration fracture, complex fracture and the surfaces are less vulnerable to further caries [7]

  • The trial has limited generalizability to SCRIPT’s context and patients: it recruited participants with more severe caries and its two interventions differed from SCRIPT’s. Their partial approach (2-step) was similar to complete caries removal (CCR); their CCR approach was more aggressive than the one we propose to use, excavating “hard” dentine

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dental caries is one of the most prevalent non-communicable disease globally and can have serious health sequelae impacting negatively on quality of life. Dental caries in permanent teeth is a widespread and costly public health problem It is one of the most prevalent non-communicable disease and can have serious health sequelae which can impact negatively on quality of life and productivity[1,2,3,4,5]. The removal of less tooth tissue for both primary and secondary caries reduces the risk of failure due to tooth-restoration fracture, complex fracture and the surfaces are less vulnerable to further caries [7]. Despite the prevalence of this non- communicable disease there is no consensus about how much caries affected tooth tissue to remove prior to placing a filling to achieve optimal patient outcomes. The evidence is of low scientific quality and mainly gleaned from studies on primary teeth

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.