Abstract

We compare the relative activities of surface-bound and fluid-phase thrombin and their inhibition by heparin and Intimatan, a novel heparin cofactor II (HCII) agonist. In vitro, we compared the observed amidolytic activities of fluid-phase and surface-bound thrombin with the expected activities based upon 125I-specific activity. In vivo, we compared the inhibitory effects of heparin and Intimatan on thrombin activity bound to injured vessel walls. In vitro, the correlations between observed and expected activities of fluid-phase and surface-bound thrombin, were: r = 0.9974, p < 0.001; and r = 0.9678, p < 0.001; respectively. In vivo, injured vessel wall surface-bound thrombin activity persisted for > 24 h. This activity was not inhibited by heparin, but was inhibited by Intimatan, p < 0.001. We conclude that surface-bound thrombin is as active as fluid-phase thrombin and remains protected from inhibition by heparin, thereby contributing to vessel wall thrombogenicity following injury. In contrast, surface-bound thrombin is inhibited by Intimatan, thereby effectively decreasing vessel wall thrombogenicity following injury in vivo.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.