Abstract

Human-induced biological invasions are common worldwide and often have negative impacts on wildlife and human societies. Several studies have shown evidence for selection on invaders after introduction to the new range. However, selective processes already acting prior to introduction have been largely neglected. Here, we tested whether such early selection acts on known behaviour-related gene variants in the yellow-crowned bishop (Euplectes afer), a pet-traded African songbird. We tested for nonrandom allele frequency changes after trapping, acclimation and survival in captivity. We also compared the native source population with two independent invasive populations. Allele frequencies of two SNPs in the dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene-known to be linked to behavioural activity in response to novelty in this species-significantly changed over all early invasion stages. They also differed between the African native population and the two invading European populations. The two-locus genotype associated with reduced activity declined consistently, but strongest at the trapping stage. Overall genetic diversity did not substantially decrease, and there is little evidence for new alleles in the introduced populations, indicating that selection at the DRD4 gene predominantly worked on the standing genetic variation already present in the native population. Our study demonstrates selection on a behaviour-related gene during the first stages of a biological invasion. Thus, pre-establishment stages of a biological invasion do not only determine the number of propagules that are introduced (their quantity), but also their phenotypic and genetic characteristics (their quality).

Highlights

  • Biological invasions are characterized by human-induced translocations of individuals to non-native ranges where they survive and reproduce (Blackburn et al, 2011)

  • Previous studies have led to a better understanding of the ecology and evolution of invasive species, with knowledge that can be applied to their management

  • These studies have made progress in predicting which factors enhance invasion success and which species may successfully establish and spread in the new area, much of the variability in invasion potential remains unexplained (Hayes & Barry, 2008). This may partly be due to the focus on species characteristics, even when substantial variation in invasion potential can be found among populations and can be expected among individuals of the same species (Cardador, Carrete, Gallardo, & Tella, 2016; Edelaar et al, 2015; Ochocki & Miller 2017)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Biological invasions are characterized by human-induced (unintentional or deliberate) translocations of individuals to non-native ranges where they survive and reproduce (Blackburn et al, 2011). To assess the possibility that early selection (if any) left a genetic signature that is still noticeable after introduction, establishment and spread, we test whether allele frequencies at the DRD4 candidate SNPs differ between the native (SEN) and the two introduced populations (SPA, POR) in a consistent manner, and if so, whether the change is in the same direction as the allele frequency changes observed during the first stages of the invasion pathway. We test whether heterozygosity at the SERT candidate locus changes along the filter steps and whether it is higher in the introduced populations (SPA, POR) than in the native one (SEN) To these ends, we genotyped 335 individuals for nine random microsatellites, the SERT candidate microsatellite, and 31 DRD4 SNPs including the two candidate SNPs previously found to associate with activity in the two invasive populations

| METHODS
| RESULTS
| DISCUSSION
Findings
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call