Abstract

• QDM is applied to identify the best PCM candidate for building heating applications. • Related literature studies are extensively reviewed and analysed. • Tm, Hf, k, compatibility, flammability and cost of PCMs are considered. • Various scenarios are discussed, including and excluding the PCM cost. • RT28HC and PureTemp23 are the best candidates, with and without the cost, respectively. Phase change materials (PCMs) are successful thermal energy storage mediums in many thermal systems, including buildings. Identifying the best PCM candidate is a critical incorporation parameter that influences building thermal performance. This paper discusses the selection of potential PCM candidates that could be applied for building heating applications in cold locations. A qualitative decision matrix (QDM) is applied for several commercial PCMs after an extensive analysis of relevant literature studies. The melting temperature, heat of fusion, thermal conductivity, compatibility, flammability and cost of each PCM are considered in the QDM to find the most suitable candidates with the best effective properties and features. PCM properties/features are assigned with scores and weights in the QDM based on their importance for the application. Three scenarios are investigated in this work, including and excluding the PCM cost with varying and equal weights. Results showed that RT28HC had the highest score in all scenarios, followed by SavE®HS29 in the first scenario (when the cost is included) and PureTemp 32 in the second scenario without considering the cost. The methodology and results presented in this work are believed to be as efficient as logical for future studies compared with the traditional methods that rely on investigating the PCM thermo-physical properties.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call