Abstract
To investigate the optimum cutoff for lymph node size to identify cases positive for perirectal lymph node (PRLN) and lateral lymph node (LPLN) metastasis of lower rectal cancer on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The subjects were 449 patients who underwent preoperative MRI. Mesorectal excision was performed in all patients (combined with lateral pelvic lymph node [LN] dissection in 324) between 2004 and 2013 at 6 institutes. Cases were classified as cN positive and cN negative on the basis of the short axis of the largest LN being greater than or equal to a cutoff or less than a cutoff, respectively. PRLN and LPLN diagnoses using 5 and 10mm cutoffs were compared with histologic diagnoses. Of the 449 patients, 55 received preoperative chemoradiotherapy. MRI was only performed after this therapy in all of these patients. For PRLNs, 5 and 10mm cutoffs gave area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.6364 and 0.5794, respectively. The 5mm cutoff gave a significantly higher AUC value (P=0.0152), with an accuracy of 63.7%, sensitivity of 72.6%, and specificity of 54.7%. For right LPLNs, the respective AUC values were 0.7418 and 0.6326 (P=0.0034), and the variables (5mm cutoff) were 77.6, 68.6, and 79.7%. For left LPLNs, AUC values were 0.7593 and 0.6559, respectively (P=0.0057), and the variables (5mm cutoff) were 79.3, 70.8, and 81.0%. Identification of LN-positive cases on the basis of PRLN and LPLN sizes was superior at a short-axis 5mm cutoff. Size-based diagnosis of LN metastasis is simple and useful, but further investigation is needed to clarify whether it is superior to diagnosis based on morphology, such as shape, border, and signal intensity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.