Abstract

BackgroundThe veined rapa whelk Rapana venosa is an important commercial shellfish in China and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) has become the standard method to study gene expression in R. venosa. For accurate and reliable gene expression results, qRT-PCR assays require housekeeping genes as internal controls, which display highly uniform expression in different tissues or stages of development. However, to date no studies have validated housekeeping genes in R. venosa for use as internal controls for qRT-PCR.MethodsIn this study, we selected the following 13 candidate genes for suitability as internal controls: elongation factor-1α (EF-1α), α-actin (ACT), cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COX1), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1α subcomplex subunit 7 (NDUFA7), 60S ribosomal protein L5 (RL5), 60S ribosomal protein L28 (RL28), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), β-tubulin (TUBB), 40S ribosomal protein S25 (RS25), 40S ribosomal protein S8 (RS8), ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 (UBE2), histone H3 (HH3), and peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase A (PPIA). We measured the expression levels of these 13 candidate internal controls in eight different tissues and twelve larvae developmental stages by qRT-PCR. Further analysis of the expression stability of the tested genes was performed using GeNorm and RefFinder algorithms.ResultsOf the 13 candidate genes tested, we found that EF-1α was the most stable internal control gene in almost all adult tissue samples investigated with RL5 and RL28 as secondary choices. For the normalization of a single specific tissue, we suggested that EF-1α and NDUFA7 are the best combination in gonad, as well as COX1 and RL28 for intestine, EF-1α and RL5 for kidney, EF-1α and COX1 for gill, EF-1α and RL28 for Leiblein and mantle, EF-1α, RL5, and NDUFA7 for liver, GAPDH, PPIA, and RL28 for hemocyte. From a developmental perspective, we found that RL28 was the most stable gene in all developmental stages measured, and COX1 and RL5 were appropriate secondary choices. For the specific developmental stage, we recommended the following combination for normalization, PPIA, RS25, and RL28 for stage 1, RL5 and RL28 for stage 2 and 5, RL28 and NDUFA7 for stage 3, and PPIA and TUBB for stage 4.DiscussionOur results are instrumental for the selection of appropriately validated housekeeping genes for use as internal controls for gene expression studies in adult tissues or larval development of R. venosa in the future.

Highlights

  • Gene expression analysis has great utility in increasing our understanding of gene function that underlies all biological and developmental processes

  • ACT, ubiquitinconjugating enzyme E2 (UBE2), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were selected from subcluster 3, while the other nine candidate housekeeping genes were from subcluster 4

  • We identified and evaluated expression stability of 13 housekeeping genes for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) normalization in R. venosa tissues and larvae developmental stages

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gene expression analysis has great utility in increasing our understanding of gene function that underlies all biological and developmental processes. Housekeeping genes are constitutive genes that express proteins necessary to maintain elementary cellular functions Because they have no organ or tissue specificity and are not affected in pathophysiological conditions, housekeeping genes should exhibit stable expression levels under various experimental conditions and in different tissues and developmental stages (Butte, Dzau & Glueck, 2002; Eisenberg & Levanon, 2003). Several housekeeping genes with relatively constant expression are considered as internal controls in qRT-PCR These include glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH ), ribosomal protein (RP), tubulin (TUB), actin (ACT ), elongation factor (EF ), ubiquitin (UBQ), and histone H3 (HH3) (Bangaru et al, 2012; Huggett et al, 2005; Lee et al, 2010; Ray & Johnson, 2014; Wang et al, 2012). For the specific developmental stage, we recommended the following combination for normalization, PPIA, RS25, and RL28 for stage 1, RL5 and RL28 for stage 2 and 5, RL28 and NDUFA7 for stage 3, and PPIA and TUBB for stage 4

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call