Selection of biomaterials for peripheral nerve regeneration using data from the nerve chamber model

Abstract

Peripheral nerve regeneration has been studied in a variety of animal models. Of these, the nerve chamber model has clearly dominated. It has been used to generate a large base of data that, however, cannot be analyzed usefully due to lack of standardization of experimental conditions and assays. Lack of standardization of critical experimental parameters of the model has, however, greatly limited the opportunity to compare directly data from independent investigators; as a result, progress in understanding conditions for optimal nerve regeneration has been stunted. In this article, we provide an overview of the major experimental parameters that must be controlled in order to generate data from independent investigators that can be compared directly (normalized data). Such parameters include the gap length, animal species, and the identity of assays used to evaluate the product of the regenerative process. Use of the recently introduced concept of critical axon elongation, the gap length at which the probability of axonal outgrowth (reinnervation) across the gap is 50%, leads to generation of a normalized database that includes data from several independent investigators. Conclusions are drawn about the relative efficacy of the various biomaterials and devices employed. Nerve chamber configurations that had the highest regenerative activity were those in which the tube wall comprised collagen and certain synthetic biodegradable polymers rather than silicone, and was cell-permeable rather than protein-permeable. In addition, the following tube fillings showed very high regenerative activity: suspensions of Schwann cells; a solution either of acidic or basic fibroblast growth factor; insoluble ECM substrates rather than solutions or gels; polyamide filaments oriented along the tube axis; highly porous, insoluble analogs of the ECM with specific structure and controlled degradation rate.