Abstract
This paper explores error-correcting codes for fuzzy extractor applications with Physical Unclonable Functions. We investigate BCH codes and compare them to convolutional codes using criteria of remaining entropy, probability of decoder failure, and hardware requirements. Parallel BCH coding is analyzed with a comprehensive search performed to find the smallest BCH code which satisfies the criteria in a parallel design to produce 128, 192, and 256-bit keys. A convolutional code is selected for comparison against the BCH codes found in this analysis. Application of the selected codes to a fuzzy extractor design is analyzed. Hardware requirements for FPGA implementations of each code is compared, with a BCH decoder design implemented for Artix-7 and Spartan-6 FPGA families. We find that a (127, 22, 47) parallel BCH code or (2, 1, 12) convolutional code is capable of performing as well as a single large BCH code, while requiring fewer FPGA resources when block RAMs can be leveraged. The convolutional code additionally requires the least amount of PUF ID bits.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
