Abstract

A selection experiment on litter size in the pig was carried on for seventeen generations in an Inra experimental herd. The founder population was made up of 10 males and 120 females from the Large White breed. Selection was first performed for ten generations in a closed line, compared to a control line derived from the same founder population. Selection was carried on within sire family on the total number of piglets born in the first two litters of the dam (TB1 + TB2). After ten generations, the selection criterion became dam TB1 only. The control line was then discontinued and a panel of frozen semen from the 11th generation boars was created for later comparisons. The selected line was opened to gilt daughters of hyperprolific boars and sows, at a rate of 1/8 per generation, and the same selection procedure was applied irrespective of the origin of the gilt. During the whole experiment, the number of ova shed (OS) and the number of live embryos (LE) at 30 days in the 3rd pregnancy were recorded. These two parts of the experiment were analysed using REML estimation of genetic parameters and a BLUP-Animal Model in order to estimate the responses to selection. Significant heritabilities for TB1, TB2, OS and LE were obtained, i.e. 0.10, 0.05, 0.43 and 0.19, respectively. Significant common environment variances and covariances were estimated for nearly all traits. Significantly positive BLUP responses per generation were observed from G0 to G17 for TB1 (+0.086), TB2 (+0.078), OS (+0.197) and LE (+0.157). However, the responses were 3- to 4-fold higher in the G12–G17 interval compared to G0–G11, and they were also in fair agreement with previous estimates based on standard least-squares procedures, using the control line and the control frozen semen panel. Since G11, the selection intensity was increased by nearly 80 p. cent compared to the previous generations, and the proportion of hyperprolific ancestry increased up to 65 p. cent in the sows of the last generation. The total genetic gain of about 1.4 piglets at birth per litter could be shared between a gain due to immigration, of about 0.8 piglets per litter, and a within-line selection gain of about 0.6 piglets. Thus by combining selection and immigration in the second part of the experiment, advantage could be taken from both the genetic superiority of the immigrants and the higher internal selection intensity made possible by immigration.

Highlights

  • Several selection experiments for litter size have been conducted in the pig, references of which may be found in Bolet et al [2] and in the review of Rothschild and Bidanel [14]

  • The objective of this paper is to present a complete analysis of the 17-generation experiment, using Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) estimation of genetic parameters, and Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of breeding values under an Animal Model (BLUP-MA)

  • All heritabilities were significantly different from zero, and high values of h2 were obtained for the physiological components of litter size (OS and live embryos (LE))

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several selection experiments for litter size have been conducted in the pig, references of which may be found in Bolet et al [2] and in the review of Rothschild and Bidanel [14]. The objective of this paper is to present a complete analysis of the 17-generation experiment, using Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) estimation of genetic parameters, and Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of breeding values under an Animal Model (BLUP-MA). These methods, much more powerful and accurate, allow to combine the information from the two parts of the experiment and to take into account the information on the origin of the hyperprolific animals introduced into the open line. It is possible to compare the responses to selection in the closed and in the open steps of this experiment

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call