Abstract

Lagging-strand genes accumulate more deleterious mutations. Genes are thus preferably located on the leading strand, an observation known as strand-biased gene distribution (SGD). Despite of this mechanistic understanding, a satisfactory quantitative model is still lacking. Replication-transcription-collisions induce stalling of the replication machinery, expose DNA to various attacks, and are followed by error-prone repairs. We found that mutational biases in non-transcribed regions can explain ~71% of the variations in SGDs in 1,552 genomes, supporting the mutagenesis origin of SGD. Mutational biases introduce energetically cheaper nucleotides on the lagging strand, and result in more expensive protein products; consistently, the cost difference between the two strands explains ~50% of the variance in SGDs. Protein costs decrease with increasing gene expression. At similar expression levels, protein products of leading-strand genes are generally cheaper than lagging-strand genes; however, highly-expressed lagging genes are still cheaper than lowly-expressed leading genes. Selection for energy efficiency thus drives some genes to the leading strand, especially those highly expressed and essential, but certainly not all genes. Stronger mutational biases are often associated with low-GC genomes; as low-GC genes encode expensive proteins, low-GC genomes thus tend to have stronger SGDs to alleviate the stronger pressure on efficient energy usage.

Highlights

  • In most prokaryotic genomes, protein-coding genes are preferably located on the leading strand[1], on which the replication is continuous[2]

  • We showed that strand-specific mutational biases, observed as nucleotide compositional biases in inter-operonic regions, can be recapitulated using coding sequences from leading and lagging strands[20]

  • We hypothesized that other factors such as mutagenesis could contribute significantly to strand-biased gene distribution (SGD)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Protein-coding genes are preferably located on the leading strand[1], on which the replication is continuous[2]. One may argue that it is the head-on collisions between replication and transcription machineries that drive the highly-expressed and essential genes to the leading strand, and cause the biased functional categories in the genes on the leading strand, rather than the other way round.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.