Abstract

BackgroundMeasuring and improving outcomes is a central element of value-based health care. However, selecting improvement interventions based on outcome measures is complex and tools to support the selection process are lacking. The goal was to present strategies for the systematic identification and selection of improvement interventions applied to the case of aortic valve disease and to combine various methods of process and outcome assessment into one integrated approach for quality improvement.MethodsFor this case study a concept-driven mixed-method approach was applied for the identification of improvement intervention clusters including: (1) benchmarking outcomes, (2) data exploration, (3) care delivery process analysis, and (4) monitoring of ongoing improvements. The main outcome measures were long-term survival and 30-day mortality. For the selection of an improvement intervention, the causal relations between the potential improvement interventions and outcome measures were quantified followed by a team selection based on consensus from a multidisciplinary team of professionals.ResultsThe study resulted in a toolbox: the Intervention Selection Toolbox (IST). The toolbox comprises two phases: (a) identifying potential for improvement, and (b) selecting an effective intervention from the four clusters expected to lead to the desired improvement in outcomes. The improvements identified for the case of aortic valve disease with impact on long-term survival in the context of the studied hospital in 2015 include: anticoagulation policy, increased attention to nutritional status of patients and determining frailty of patients before the treatment decision.ConclusionsIdentifying potential for improvement and carefully selecting improvement interventions based on (clinical) outcome data demands a multifaceted approach. Our toolbox integrates both care delivery process analyses and outcome analyses. The toolbox is recommended for use in hospital care for the selection of high-impact improvement interventions.

Highlights

  • Measuring and improving outcomes is a central element of value-based health care

  • The toolbox is recommended for use in hospital care for the selection of highimpact improvement interventions

  • Benchmarking resulted in one outcome measure for both Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): long-term survival

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Measuring and improving outcomes is a central element of value-based health care. The importance of improving outcomes in health care has widely been recognized [1,2,3,4,5], while the improvement of quality in health care is a science in itself [6]. Measuring and improving outcomes is a central element of value-based health care (VBHC) [8]. Selecting improvement interventions based on outcome measures is complex and tools to support the selection process are lacking. Improvement interventions are interventions or tools that change processes leading to improved quality of care [9, 10]. For the purpose of this study, improvement interventions may concern any deliberate action aimed at achieving positive change in outcomes through structure and/or process interventions

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call