Abstract

Use of augmentative non-speech systems of communication have increasingly been reported as effective in promoting communicative development in individuals with autism and related handicaps. While various forms of sign language have constituted the primary non-speech communication mode, other approaches have also been used, including plastic symbol, written word and pictorial systems. While the reported results have overall been encouraging, questions remain as to whether one particular system, for instance, sign language is most suitable to the autistic population as a whole, and at which point and how it should be taught. This paper examines to what extent individuals with autism may share some common characteristics that would make them prime candidates for one particular system over another. Given that visuo-spatial abilities tend to be well developed, it is argued that a case could be made for the use of communication modes that incorporate non-transient stimuli. Nevertheless, given the heterogeneity ...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.