Abstract

The risk management systems used in occupational safety and health typically assess the risk of identified hazards using a tabular format commonly called a risk assessment matrix. Typically, columns are named with words indicating severity, and rows are named with words indicating likelihood or probability. Some risk assessment matrices use words reflecting the extent of exposure to a hazard. This project was undertaken with the aim of helping the designers of risk assessment matrices select appropriate names for the rows and columns. A survey of undergraduate students studying engineering or occupational safety and health obtained ratings of 16 English language words and phrases for each of the three factors. Analyses of 84 completed surveys included comparing average ratings on a 100-point scale. Using the averages, appropriately spaced sets of words and phrases were identified for naming the row and column categories. Based on results, the authors recommend word sets of three, four, and five for severity; three, four, five, and six for likelihood; and two and three for extent of exposure. The study methodology may be useful for future research, and the resulting word sets and numerical ratings may be helpful when creating a new, or reassessing an established, risk assessment matrix.

Highlights

  • Risk assessments are currently recognized as a core component of occupational health and safety management systems [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • A basic tool for these assessments—a risk assessment matrix (RAM)—provides a means for evaluating the level of risk associated with an identified hazard

  • In occupational safety and health (OSH), RAMs are used for characterizing the risk level of specified hazards by accounting for the estimated harm and likelihood of occurrence [2,3,4,5,6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Risk assessments are currently recognized as a core component of occupational health and safety management systems [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In occupational safety and health (OSH), RAMs are used for characterizing the risk level of specified hazards by accounting for the estimated harm and likelihood of occurrence [2,3,4,5,6]. Risk assessments may account for a broad range of foreseeable consequences, such as harm to property, equipment, facilities, and/or the environment, or be more focused on personnel being injured, killed, or developing an illness [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. After estimating the foreseeable severity of harm, the analysts must consider how likely the harm or hazardous situation will occur. This second factor is typically referred to as either likelihood or probability. Public Health 2020, 17, 5521; doi:10.3390/ijerph17155521 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph

Formatting Options for RAMs
Assigning Risk Levels to Cells
Objective
Determine the Content of the Survey
Sampling Approach
Survey Instrument
Procedures
First Process—Remove Poor Booklets
Second Process—Identify Suitable Words and Phrases
Findings of First Process
Findings of the Second Process
Evaluation
Severity Words and Phrases
Probability-Based Words and Phrases
Likelihood-Based Words and Phrases
Example Application
Limitations of the Project
Recommendations
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.