Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine which software systems business school administrators use to support accreditation efforts and how administrators select and use these systems. This study also provides best practice suggestions from institutions using faculty data management systems to support accreditation efforts. Design/methodology/approach This study used a sequential explanatory design using an internet-based survey for business school administrators involved with accreditation reporting with follow-up interviews with survey respondents. Findings There are four major software vendors that most respondents use for managing reporting of faculty research activity and sufficiency. The location of the school appears to influence the system selected. For assurance of learning reporting, most schools used an in-house or manual system. Respondents highlighted the importance of doing a thorough needs analysis before selecting a system. Research limitations/implications Although respondents were geographically diverse, having a larger sample with schools in developing regions would provide greater generalizability of results. Practical implications This study gives business school leaders a comprehensive overview of the business schools’ data management systems, criteria used in system selection and best practices for system selection and implementation, faculty engagement and ongoing maintenance. Originality/value This study addresses the limited attention given to resources and best practices for selecting and implementing faculty data management software for accreditation in the academic and industry literature despite the significant investment of resources for schools and the importance such systems play in a successful accreditation effort.
Highlights
Many business schools recognize the inadequacy of their reporting systems and associated policies and procedures to meet the multi-year reporting requirements necessary to demonstrate compliance with accreditors’ standards once a school’s leadership begins drafting the initial AACSB accreditation self-evaluation and other pre-accreditation reports
Survey of accreditation administrators An internet-based survey was developed and distributed to understand which data systems schools used for faculty research, faculty sufficiency and assurance of learning (AOLs) data management, what information business schools used to make the decision on which system to purchase and school demographics
All interviewees knew how the school was using the faculty data management system and most interviewees assisted in the initial system selection
Summary
Many business schools recognize the inadequacy of their reporting systems and associated policies and procedures to meet the multi-year reporting requirements necessary to demonstrate compliance with accreditors’ standards once a school’s leadership begins drafting the initial AACSB accreditation self-evaluation and other pre-accreditation reports. Business schools find the faculty sufficiency and qualifications reporting requirements to be challenging. To solve these challenges and meet ongoing reporting requirements, many schools recognize early in the accreditation process the need for a software solution
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
