Abstract

ABSTRACTIn each of four replications, 32 packer‐style hams were randomly allotted to one of eight treatment groups in which the curing brine formulated for a 10% pump contained: (1) No phosphate; (2) 100% sodium tripolyphosphate (STP); (3) 5% sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) + 95% STP; (4) 10% SHMP + 90% STP; (5) 5% Quadrafos (SQ) + 95% STP; (6) 10% SQ + 90% STP; (7) 10% tetrasodium pyrophosphate (TSPP) + 90% STP; or (8) 20% TSPP + 80% STP. Raw hams were subjectively evaluated for quality, samples were removed for analysis, and hams were processed according to commercial procedures. Processing losses and cooking losses were calculated, and physical and sensory properties of the processed, cooked hams were measured. The 20% TSPP blend was least effective in reducing processing shrinkage; whereas, the 5% SHMP blend was the most effective. Nonphosphate treated hams had greater cooking losses and were scored lowest for all sensory attributes. Greater drip cooking losses occurred as amounts of SHMP and SQ increased in the phosphate blends.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call