Selected pharmacokinetic issues of the use of antiepileptic drugs and parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients.

Muhannad R M Salih,Mohd Baidi Bahari,Arwa Y Abd

doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-71

Muhannad R M Salih, Mohd Baidi Bahari + Show 1 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-9-71

Copy DOI

Journal: Nutrition journal	Publication Date: Dec 1, 2010
Citations: 138	License type: cc-by

Affiliation: Universiti Sains Malaysia

Abstract

ObjectivesTo conduct a systematic review for the evidence supporting or disproving the reality of parenteral nutrition- antiepileptic drugs interaction, especially with respect to the plasma protein-binding of the drug.MethodsThe articles related to the topic were identified through Medline and PubMed search (1968-Feburary 2010) for English language on the interaction between parenteral nutrition and antiepileptic drugs; the search terms used were anti-epileptic drugs, parenteral nutrition, and/or interaction, and/or in vitro. The search looked for prospective randomized and nonrandomized controlled studies; prospective nonrandomized uncontrolled studies; retrospective studies; case reports; and in vitro studies. Full text of the articles were then traced from the Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) library subscribed databases, including Wiley-Blackwell Library, Cochrane Library, EBSCOHost, OVID, ScienceDirect, SAGE Premier, Scopus, SpringerLINK, and Wiley InterScience. The articles from journals not listed by USM library were traced through inter library loan.ResultsThere were interactions between parenteral nutrition and drugs, including antiepileptics. Several guidelines were designed for the management of illnesses such as traumatic brain injuries or cancer patients, involving the use of parenteral nutrition and antiepileptics. Moreover, many studies demonstrated the in vitro and in vivo parenteral nutrition -drugs interactions, especially with antiepileptics.ConclusionsThere was no evidence supporting the existence of parenteral nutrition-antiepileptic drugs interaction. The issue has not been studied in formal researches, but several case reports and anecdotes demonstrate this drug-nutrition interaction. However, alteration in the drug-free fraction result from parenteral nutrition-drug (i.e. antiepileptics) interactions may necessitate scrupulous reassessment of drug dosages in patients receiving these therapies. This reassessment may be particularly imperative in certain clinical situations characterized by hypoalbuminemia (e.g., burn patients).

Highlights

In the past, many efforts have been made to supply nutrients intravenously through cannulation of peripheral veins
There was no evidence supporting the existence of parenteral nutrition-antiepileptic drugs interaction due to the lack of prospective, randomized, controlled trials
Alteration in the drug-free fraction resulting from coadministration of parenteral nutrition (PN) fluids may be clinically important and may necessitate scrupulous reassessment of drug dosages in patients receiving these courses of therapies

Summary

Introduction

Many efforts have been made to supply nutrients intravenously through cannulation of peripheral veins. In 1968, Dudrick and his colleagues administered a nutrition solution through the superior vena cava, enabling the administration of a small volume of nutrition solution with high nutrient concentrations [2]. Previous studies have demonstrated a positive effect of nutrition support on length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality [8,18,28,33,34,35,36]. A metaanalysis study has revealed that total parenteral nutrition does not have an effect on the death rate of surgical patients, but it may possibly decrease the complication rate, in malnourished patients [37]. Clinicians must consider the general guidelines and clinical judgments as the basis and structure for deciding the suitability of nutrition support

Objectives

Methods

Conclusion