Abstract

Research reveals that many local governments across the world do not demonstrate transparency by inviting local citizens in their decision-making activities. This research aims to explore the financial and governance factors that may influence municipalities/councils to make closed-door meetings. Based on the Critical Social and Critical Urban theories this research has hypothesized three models, which have been tested with empirical data collected from 79 local councils/municipalities in Victoria, Australia. The analysis reveals that financial factors such as surplus-income and cash equivalent significantly influence municipalities to conduct closed-door meetings. On the other hand, governance factors such as citizen-satisfactions have no significant relationship with closed-door meetings. These findings have implications for policy-makers and public managers to rethink and redesign the factors that influence on local government transparency.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.