Abstract

Despite the increasing technological level of the reflection seismic method, the imaging of fold and thrust belts remains a demanding task, and usually leaves some questions regarding the dips, the shape of the subthrust structures or the most correct approach to velocity model building. There is no straightforward method that can provide structural representation of the near-surface geological boundaries and their velocities. The in-terpretation of refracted waves frequently remains the only available technique that may be used for this purpose, although one must be aware of its limitations which appear in the complex geological settings. In the presented study, the analysis of velocity values obtained in the shallow part of Carpathian orogenic wedge by means of various geophysical methods was carried out. It revealed the lack of consistency between the results of 3D refraction tomography and both the sonic log and uphole velocities. For that reason, instead of the indus-try-standard utilization of tomography, a novel, geologically-consistent method of velocity model building is pro-posed. In the near-surface part, the uphole velocities are assigned to the formations, documented by the surface geologic map. Interpreted time-domain horizons, supplemented by main thrusts, are used to make the velocity field fully-compatible with the litho-stratigraphic units of the Carpathians. The author demonstrates a retrospective overview of seismic data imaging in the area of the Polish Carpathian orogenic wedge and discusses the most recent global innovations in seismic methodology which are the key to successful hydrocarbon exploration in fold and thrust regions.

Highlights

  • The main focus of this study are mutually-dependent aspects of seismic imaging and velocity model building in fold and thrust belt areas

  • In order to find out if refracted wave tomography provides the correct solution in the shallow section of the Carpathian fold and thrust belt, the modelled first arrivals (Figs. 8, 9) were picked and inverted in the chosen ZondST2D commercial software (Kaminsky 2020)

  • The uphole data are represented by the maximum velocity encountered at the measurement point, and in the case of the tomography, each 5 m depth sample of the resulting volume, is taken into account

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main focus of this study are mutually-dependent aspects of seismic imaging and velocity model building in fold and thrust belt areas. A typical and frequent problem is the failure of conventional data processing and poor imaging of the thrust structures caused by the limitation of time-domain procedures to account for lateral velocity variations. The following types of data were utilized: 3D seismic data set (merged and processed with neighbouring legacy volumes), surface geologic maps, well stratigraphy, uphole data, VSP, formation evaluation results, sonic and density logs.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call