Seizure outcome with responsive neurostimulation (RNS) comparing strip versus depth leads

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare seizure outcomes and complication rates in patients treated with only responsive neurostimulation (RNS) strip leads with those treated with only RNS depth leads. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed using the institutional epilepsy surgery database. Included was any patient implanted with the RNS system between August 2015 and May 2018 with either two depth (2D) or two strip (2S) leads connected to the device and at least 6 months follow-up. Excluded were those with a combination of active depth and strip leads. Data extracted from the charts comprised demographic information, duration of epilepsy, presence of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion, prior resective surgery, clinically disabling seizures at baseline and follow-up, prior invasive monitoring, location (mesial temporal or neocortical) and number of seizure foci, unilateral or bilateral RNS lead placement, and postoperative complications. ResultsOf 48 screened patients, 34 met study inclusion criteria. Of these, 15 were treated with 2D leads and 19 with 2S leads. Groups 2D and 2S were comparable with respect to age at onset, duration of epilepsy, baseline seizure frequency, and exposure time to RNS. After adjustment for patient age and duration of epilepsy, seizure frequency in 2S patients was noted to be decreased by 83% (p = 0.046), while it was reduced by 51% (p = 0.080) in 2D patients. The complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups. ConclusionIn our small retrospective population, patients with RNS strip leads experienced a significantly greater seizure reduction than patients with RNS depth leads, without a difference in complication rate.