Abstract

SUMMARY In Northeast India, three major plates interact along two convergent boundaries: the Himalayas and the Indo–Burma Ranges, which meet at the Assam Syntaxis. To clarify this tectonic interaction and the underlying dynamics, we determine the regional seismotectonic stress from the stress inversion of 285 double couple focal mechanism solutions of earthquakes with an average magnitude of 5. We then compare the reconstructed stress regimes with the available information about geodetically determined relative displacements. North–south compression, in a direction consistent with India–Eurasia convergence, prevails in the whole area from the Eastern Himalayas to the Bengal Basin, through the Shillong–Mikir Massif and the Upper Assam Valley. E–W extension in Tibet is related to this N–S India– Eurasia convergence. Not only does the major N–S compression affect the outer segments of the Indo–Burma Ranges, it also extends into the descending slab of Indian lithosphere below these ranges, although stresses at depth are controlled by bending of the slab beneath the Burmese arc. The existence of widespread N–S compression in the Bengal Basin, far away from the Himalayan front, is compatible with the previously proposed convergence between a Shillong– Mikir–Assam Valley block and the Indian craton. E–W compression inside this block supports the hypothesis of a component of eastward extrusion. Stress inversion of focal mechanism solutions in the Indo–Burma Ranges reveals a complex stress pattern. The Burmese arc and its underlying lithosphere experience nearly arcperpendicular extension with ESE–WNW trends in the northernmost, NE-trending segment and ENE–WSW trends in the main N–S arc segment. Such extensional stress, documented from many arcs, is likely a response to pull from and bending of the subducting plate. At the same time, the Indo–Burma Ranges are under compression as a result of oblique convergence between the Sunda and Indian plates. The maximum compressive stress rotates from NE–SW across the inner and northern arc to E–W near the Bengal Basin. This rotation is consistent with the deformation partitioning reflected in the rotation of relative displacement vectors, from a SSW-directed Sunda–Burma motion to a WSW-directed Burma–India motion. As a consequence of this partitioning, the major belt-parallel fault zones show a variety of movements across the main N–S arc segment, from right-lateral slip in the inner ranges to oblique reverse-dextral slip in the outer ranges and pure thrusting in the westernmost foreland belt.

Highlights

  • The inversion of focal mechanisms solutions of earthquakes to determine the seismotectonic stress regimes done in this paper provides a new way to decipher the active tectonics of the area and to evaluate the geodynamic implications, taking into account the recent kinematic information from geodetic studies

  • We show that despite the large extent and structural complexity of the studied region, it is possible to reconstruct consistent seismotectonic stress states, which are multiple in space and time

  • In addition to the RRL-J/NGRI-H network data, arrival times reported by the seismic stations maintained by the India Meteorological Department (IMD) at Shillong (SHL), Gauhati University (GAU), Manipur University (MAN) and Mizoram University (AZL)

Read more

Summary

SUMMARY

In Northeast India, three major plates interact along two convergent boundaries: the Himalayas and the Indo–Burma Ranges, which meet at the Assam Syntaxis To clarify this tectonic interaction and the underlying dynamics, we determine the regional seismotectonic stress from the stress inversion of 285 double couple focal mechanism solutions of earthquakes with an average magnitude of 5. The Burmese arc and its underlying lithosphere experience nearly arcperpendicular extension with ESE–WNW trends in the northernmost, NE-trending segment and ENE–WSW trends in the main N–S arc segment Such extensional stress, documented from many arcs, is likely a response to pull from and bending of the subducting plate. This rotation is consistent with the deformation partitioning reflected in the rotation of relative displacement vectors, from a SSW-directed Sunda–Burma motion to a WSW-directed Burma–India motion.

N T RO DUCTION
Eastern Himalayas
Indo–Burman orogen
Assam valley
Shillong–Mikir Plateaus
Regional seismic network and waveform inversion
Focal mechanism solutions of earthquakes: the data
Definition of subzones
E A RT H Q UA KEMECHANISMSINNE
E Indo–Burma Region
P and T dihedra analysis of the entire data set
P and T dihedra analysis: definition of subsets
The inverse method
Application to nine subzones of NE India
Limitations: data heterogeneity
Coupled inversion and subset separation
Northeast India
Indo–Burma ranges
Multiple stress regimes in Northeast India
B E N E AT HINDO – BURMARANGES
Synthesis of palaeostress results
Comparison with other sources and methodological insights
Kinematics of the Shillong–Mikir–Assam Valley block
Findings
Consistency between seismotectonic stress and kinematics
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call