Seismic Work Flow Characterizes Deep, Thin Formation Layers Offshore South China Sea

Abstract

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper OTC 30164, “Deep and Thin Overpressure Reservoir Characterization of Paleogene Wenchang Formation in the Enping 17 Sag of the South China Sea,” by Jun Liu and Yingwei Li, CNOOC, and Donghai Liang, Schlumberger, et al. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Copyright 2021 Offshore Technology Conference. Reproduced by permission. The complete paper describes an integrated work flow for 3D seismic reservoir characterization of offshore deep and thin layers in the Eocene Wenchang formation (WCF) without sufficient well data. The work flow includes seismic data reprocessing, well-log-based rock physics analysis, seismic structure interpretation, 3D simultaneous amplitude variation with offset (AVO) inversion, 3D lithology prediction, and geological integrated analysis. Formation Development and Objectives The Pearl River Mouth basin (PRMB) on the northern continental margin of the South China Sea has undergone multistage extensional rifts. The Enping Sag lies in the Zhu1 depression, north of the PRMB, and consists of three subsags. Enping 17 is the largest and deepest sag, with an area of 550 km2, and the thickness of Eocene sediments is greater than 3000 m. The deep middle Eocene WCF, with gray lacustrine mudstones, is hydrocarbon-rich and is the major source rock in the area. A wildcat well had penetrated the WCF at an area with a vertical thickness of 380 m. During drilling, the mud weight was increased to 1.46 g/cm3 from 4570 m total vertical depth (TVD) downward because of increasing pore pressure and higher background gas abnormalities in the WCF. A high pore-pressure gradient of 14.5 KPa/m was measured by drillstem test (DST) at a depth of 4641.5 m TVD. Under the protection of the high pore pressure, the high-quality reservoir layer from 4642 to 4651 m TVD was encountered with 12% average porosity, 3.6-md permeability, and 47.1% saturation. Although a hydrocarbon sample was not obtained during the downhole test because of technical restrictions of DST in 1985, gas surge and a small amount of gas and condensate oil were observed after the test instruments were pulled to surface. With the subsequent development of field techniques, it was likely that current drilling and DST techniques could achieve productive oil flow in this layer.