Abstract
In the February 1991 issue of GEOPHYSICS, Anton Ziolkowski gives a scathing criticism of statistical wavelet estimation methods. Among other points, Ziolkowski questions the validity of the randomness assumption. This assumption allows statistical methods to estimate the seismic source wavelet autocorrelation from the seismic trace autocorrelation. In this study, we examine this traditional assumption of a random reflectivity sequence. The validity of this assumption is examined by using well-log synthetic seismograms and by using a procedure for evaluating the resulting deconvolutions. With real data, we compare our wavelet estimations with the in-situ recording of the wavelet from a vertical seismic profile (VSP). As a result of our examination of the randomness assumption, we present a fairly simple test that can be used to evaluate the validity of a randomness assumption.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.