Seismic risk assessment of highway bridges in western Canada under crustal, subcrustal, and subduction earthquakes

Abstract

This study conducts seismic risk assessment of highway bridges in western Canada. The performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) framework is enhanced to assess the expected annual repair cost ratio (ARCR) and annual restoration time (ART) of a benchmark bridge class under the region’s three types of earthquakes - shallow crustal earthquakes (CEs), deep subcrustal earthquakes (SCEs), and megathrust Cascadia subduction earthquakes (CSEs). First, event-specific seismic hazard models are considered, whereas event-consistent ground motions are selected for non-linear time history analyses. Compared with those from CEs and SCEs, CSE ground motions feature a much longer duration. This long-duration effect is captured by validating the numerical model of the bridge column against (1) a cyclic pushover test under standard versus long-duration loading protocols and (2) a shaking table test excited by six consecutive ground motions. Besides, the Park and Ang damage index is utilized as the column’s engineering demand parameter (EDP) and updated as a demand-capacity ratio model when reaching four different damage states. A comprehensive list of ground motion intensity measures (IMs) is considered where the spectra acceleration at one second, Sa(1.0), is chosen as the most suitable IM based on its performance in proficiency, efficiency, practicality, and EDP-IM correlation across all three earthquake events. Subsequently, component- and system-level fragility models are derived under each earthquake type using the cloud analysis that convolves the seismic demands with capacity models for multiple bridge components. To further quantify and propagate the epistemic uncertainty associated with the development of probabilistic seismic demand models (PSDMs), the bootstrap resampling technique is utilized to generate numerous seismic demand datasets and develop a stochastic set of seismic fragility curves. Finally, the bootstrapped, event-dependent fragility models are combined with the respective hazard models and probabilistic loss functions to assess the expected ARCR and ART for the benchmark bridge class. This study underscores the significantly higher seismic risk of highway bridges when facing CSEs, followed by CEs and SCEs.