Abstract

Seismic performance of a building is commonly evaluated by applying same design ground motions at each building foundation. However, local soil conditions beneath a building likely vary, and these variations could result in out-of-phased design ground motions at each of the foundation locations. In this study, building’s responses during earthquakes were analyzed and compared using same and out-of-phase ground motions. The building is 10-story, 90m-wide, reinforced concrete structure supported on isolated footings with tie beams. Dynamic time response analyses were performed using five earthquake records which were scaled to a design response spectrum for a location in Surabaya. Seismic modification factor, R, of 8 was used. The results indicate that the use of out-of-phase ground motions does not have significant impacts on building inter-story drifts; it results, however in significantly higher column base shears and tie beam axial forces compared to those calculated using same ground motions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call