Abstract

AbstractSeismic refraction and reflection shooting was carried out along three profiles about 10 km long, angled 60° to one another, near “Byrd” station, Antarctica, during the 1970–71 field season. No dependence of velocity upon azimuth was found, but velocities at 200 or 300 m depth were slightly greater than at a site 30 km away where measurements were made in 1958. The difference can probably be attributed to different ice fabrics arising from a 50% difference in snow accumulation rates at the two sites. The velocity depth and density–velocity functions at the two sites are also significantly different, but close agreement was found at each site between the depths to significant changes in the velocity gradient and the depths of fundamental change in the densification process. Such agreement may permit density–depth curves, and consequently accumulation rates, to be measured by seismic refraction shooting alone.The reflection shooting on a common reflection-point profile led to a good determination of mean velocity through the ice as a function of angle of incidence. The results agree closely with similar measurements at the 1958 site, and with an anisotropic model based on glaciological and sonic logging observations in the deep drill hole. The mean vertical velocity of 3.90–3.93 km/s through the solid ice is about 2% higher than has commonly been used for determinations of ice thickness from seismic reflection shooting.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.