Abstract
This paper focuses on the seismic performance of mountainous railway bridges having different pier type i.e. rectangular hollow piers and solid piers. The piers used were of same materials and inertial properties. For this, 3-D FEM models of these bridges were created by ANSYS 15.0. For seismic assessment, Response Spectrum and Dynamic Time-History Analysis methods were adopted. Different types of earthquake waves used were Elcentro, Wenchuan and Nepal earthquakes, all normalized to 0.3 g Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA). The study concluded that even though the hollow pier bridges are susceptible to large displacements, its dealing with internal forces is remarkable compared to solid pier bridges.
Highlights
Earthquake follows hazard for many bridges which has turned out to be fatal in some cases
This paper focuses on the seismic performance of mountainous railway bridges having different pier type i.e. rectangular hollow piers and solid piers
The study concluded that even though the hollow pier bridges are susceptible to large displacements, its dealing with internal forces is remarkable compared to solid pier bridges
Summary
Earthquake follows hazard for many bridges which has turned out to be fatal in some cases. People are influenced for large number of years from seismic activities, concrete research on bridges started not long ago. Bridges should be designed such that only non-hazardous, and minor damage occurs which allows to maintain safety measures after an earthquake. Pier failure from seismic hazard has been one of the most likely failures but a well-designed and strong seismic performance of the bridge can greatly reduce the hazard. Under seismic loads, in long span continuous mountainous bridge, the stiffness of the pier becomes obviously less because it is long and slender; there-
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have