Abstract

The addition of a rocking structural system will soften the connection between a foundation and superstructure and help the beam-column connections to become softer than typical ones. These structures, with the addition of rocking structural systems, follow the elastic gap opening mechanism to soften the structural seismic response. Post-tensioned prestressed tendons and dampers are used in rocking systems to enable the structure to return to its initial position (self-centering) and to dissipate seismic energy, respectively. The current study investigated the use of a rocking shear wall system in steel moment-resistant and hinged frames and determined the amount of damage and the economic effects on the structures. For this purpose, 3D models of 3-, 9-, and 20-story SAC-project steel frames were modeled and validated according to FEMA-355C and then a hybrid rocking shear wall was added to them. The structures were designed and modeled according to common seismic codes and were analyzed using nonlinear time history when subjected to a series of records from FEMA-355C. The results showed that the use of a hinged frame attached to a rocking concrete shear wall (HFR) increased the fundamental period and inter-story displacement and decreased the amount of steel used in the 3-, 9-, and 20-story models compared to similar models with fixed connections in moment frames (MFR). The HFR shear wall models exhibited better seismic performance than MFR models, which increased their load-bearing capacity and reduced their weight, which reduced construction costs.

Highlights

  • A common problem with typical buildings is failure of the fixed connections, especially column-foundation connections

  • The results showed that the use of a hinged frame attached to a rocking concrete shear wall (HFR) increased the fundamental period and inter-story displacement and decreased the amount of steel used in the 3, 9, and 20-story models compared to similar models with fixed connections in moment frames (MFR)

  • The global behavior of the relative displacement curves of the 3, 9, and 20-story models was similar. This indicates that the behavior of the rocking concrete shear wall dominated because of the weight of the concrete wall and that the moment frame had no effect on the overall behavior of the structure, but only slightly reduced the relative displacement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A common problem with typical buildings is failure of the fixed connections, especially column-foundation connections. The results showed that the use of a hinged frame attached to a rocking concrete shear wall (HFR) increased the fundamental period and inter-story displacement and decreased the amount of steel used in the 3-, 9-, and 20-story models compared to similar models with fixed connections in moment frames (MFR).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call