Abstract
The current paper compares the seismic performance of buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs) and ordinary concentrically braced frames (CBFs) through nonlinear static and time history analysis. Two groups of BRBFs and CBFs including 5, 10 and 15 story frames are modeled and nonlinear pushover analysis is carried out. To further investigate the performance of frames, a selection of near-fault and far-field ground motion records are used for time history analysis. The results indicate the acceptable seismic performance and conformity of low-rise CBFs with BRB frames under far-field records. However, BRB frames present more satisfying results with regards to inter-story drifts, residual drift responses and energy dissipation in case of near-fault seismic excitations. Moreover, the implementation of BRBs provides better performance against the Basic Safety Earthquake 1 (BSE-1).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
