Abstract
As a result of the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes, over 60% of the concrete buildings in the Christchurch Central Business District have been demolished. This experience has highlighted the need to provide guidance on the residual capacity and repairability of earthquake-damaged concrete buildings. As limited testing has been performed on repaired components, this study focuses on the performance of severely-damaged lightly-reinforced concrete walls repaired through replacement of reinforcement and concrete in the damaged region. The damage prior to repair included buckling and fracture of longitudinal reinforcement, crushing and spalling of concrete, and, for one of the two specimens, out-of-plane instability of the gross section. Prior to repairing the wall specimens, tensile testing of reinforcement with welded connections was conducted to verify acceptable performance of welds suitable for reinstating the damaged reinforcement. Repairs to the specimens consisted of removal of damaged concrete through either hydro-demolition or jack hammering, followed by cutting and removal of damaged reinforcement and reinstatement of new reinforcement and repair mortar. The two repaired wall specimens were tested using a standard protocol that was identical to that used for one of the two original wall specimens. Aside from a difference in the elastic stiffness, the load-deformation responses of the repaired specimens were similar to that of the originally-tested specimen through to the first loading cycle at 2.0% drift, beyond which strength degradation was more pronounced for the repaired specimens. The overall performance of the repaired walls relative to the original wall indicates that it is feasible to achieve acceptable performance of severely-damaged concrete walls repaired through replacement of reinforcement and concrete in the damaged region.
Highlights
The 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes in New Zealand resulted in more than $NZ 40 billion in losses and demolition of approximately 60% of the multi-storey concrete buildings due to the widespread damage and closure of the Christchurch Central Business District for more than two years [1]
Discussion is limited in scope to specimens M5, M5-R, and M6-R, as the similarity in testing protocol for these three specimens enables direct assessment of the effectiveness of the repair techniques
While some variation is evident in the load at cracking, similar cracks patterns developed for the repaired walls and the original wall, shown in Figure 11 and Figure 12, indicating that the crack pattern was not altered by the use of welded connections and repair mortar
Summary
The 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes in New Zealand resulted in more than $NZ 40 billion in losses and demolition of approximately 60% of the multi-storey concrete buildings due to the widespread damage and closure of the Christchurch Central Business District for more than two years [1]. Recent studies surrounding the Canterbury earthquakes have found that a significant number of modern multi-storey buildings that had a low damage ratio (where the damage ratio is the estimated cost of repair compared to cost of replacement of a structure) were deemed uneconomic to repair, declared a total insurance loss, and demolished [1]. In addition to epoxy injection of cracks, repairs to reinforced concrete walls included reinstatement of spalled concrete with structural mortar. Jacking was successfully used to reposition the building, and the building was re-opened for occupancy, with the total repair cost estimated as 25% of the cost to demolish and re-build These examples demonstrate a variety of methods used to repair structural concrete after earthquakes, including full reinstatement of critical zones of structural elements.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.