Abstract

Recent earthquakes have revealed that conventional seismic design philosophy allows for large levels of nonstructural damage. Nonstructural earthquake damage results in extensive repair costs and lengthy functional disruptions, as nonstructural systems comprise the majority of building investment and are essential to building operations. A better understanding of the expected overall seismic performance of code-compliant buildings is needed. This study investigates the seismic performance of a conventional building. A 16-storey steel office building was designed using a modern seismic structural code (Eurocode 8). This study is the first to assess in detail the substantial earthquake repair costs expected in a modern Eurocode concentric braced frame structure, considering nonstructural systems with the FEMA P-58 procedure. The breakdown of total repair costs by engineering demand parameter and by fragility group is novel. The seismic performance assessment indicated that substantial earthquake repair costs are expected. Limitations of the Eurocode nonstructural damage methodology were revealed in a novel manner using FEMA P-58, as the prescribed drift limits did not minimize nonstructural repair costs. These findings demonstrate the need for design procedures that improve nonstructural seismic performance. The study results provide a benchmark on which to evaluate retrofit alternatives for existing buildings and design options for new structures.

Highlights

  • Recent earthquakes such as the 2010 Canterbury earthquake and the 2010 Chile earthquake have demonstrated that buildings that incur minimal structural damage frequently experience extensive nonstructural damage (Dhakal 2010; Miranda et al 2012)

  • Recent earthquakes have revealed that conventional seismic design philosophy allows for large levels of nonstructural damage

  • This study is the first to assess in detail the substantial earthquake repair costs expected in a modern Eurocode concentric braced frame structure, considering nonstructural systems with the FEMA P-58 procedure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent earthquakes such as the 2010 Canterbury earthquake and the 2010 Chile earthquake have demonstrated that buildings that incur minimal structural damage frequently experience extensive nonstructural damage (Dhakal 2010; Miranda et al 2012). Nonstructural systems refer to building contents, architectural components, and mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems. These systems are essential to building functions and comprise the majority of building investment (Fig. 1). Attaining a target level of seismic performance mandates the harmonization of structural and nonstructural performance levels. An improved understanding of the expected structural and nonstructural seismic performance of conventional code-compliant buildings is needed. This study assesses the seismic performance of a structural design that is representative of conventional buildings constructed in seismic regions. The results of the performance assessment provide a benchmark on which to evaluate retrofit alternatives for existing buildings or design options for new structures

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call