Abstract

Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) have been widely used in seismic prone areas around the world. However, one major problem associated with the steel BRB frames is the excessive residual deformation under strong earthquakes, mainly due to the low post-yield stiffness ratio of the steel BRBs. Recently, the community has fabricated the iron-based shape memory alloy (FeSMA) BRBs, which exhibited full hysteresis with high post-yield stiffness ratios, but the seismic behavior of the FeSMA BRB frames still remains unknown. As such, this paper conducts seismic performance analysis of multi-story steel frames equipped with the FeSMA BRBs, through a comparison with those equipped with conventional steel BRBs. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is further conducted to establish the probability seismic demand models. Based on the IDA data, bivariate fragility analysis is conducted to quantify the probability of exceedance, conditioned on various limitations of the maximum and residual interstory drift ratios. According to current analysis, it indicates that both the maximum interstory drift ratios and the maximum floor accelerations are comparable between these two types of BRB frames. The major advantage of the FeSMA BRBs over the steel BRBs is that the former can better control residual interstory drift ratios.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call