Abstract
The aim of this paper is to discriminate the depositional facies, geometries and mechanisms of deposition of contouritic fans from those of turbidite distal fans, with a view to provide better resolution of reservoir prediction. Two examples are analysed: the Vema contouritic drift in the South Brazilian Basin and the Cap Ferret turbiditic fan in the Bay of Biscaye. The Vema contourite fan is a Neogene mud-rich accumulation (200–400 m thick), fed by Antarctic Bottom Water bottom currents and located downstream of the Rio Grande Rise. It forms one single-mound fan-shaped body in between two major channels, and where the main part of the deep circulation is funnelled into. As a result of the morphological and hydrological background, the comourite drift progrades mostly downstream. The accumulation was built as several depositional units (‘channel-levee’ systems) bounded by widespread discontinuities showing erosional patterns. This resulted from episodes of strong and/or unstable current activity producing the discontinuities, alternating with periods of relatively weak and stable currents and major deposition. The Pliocene-Quaternary Cap Ferret distal deep-sea fan is a thick (500 m) sand-rich turbiditic accumulation fed directly by an uplifting mountain range. The accumulation is developed downstream of a main turbiditic feeder channel and the volume of sediment involved is much higher than for the Vema contourite fan. It shows a complex network of shallow channels and low-relief levees which merge downstream into thin, sandy, sheet-like deposits. Several depositional units are stacked vertically. Each unit is built by the lateral migration of a ‘channel-levee’ system. The stacking pattern of the successive units is prograding towards the basin. The presence of major discontinuities cutting throughout a whole accumulation, and the fairly irregular geometry of the ‘channel-levee’ deposits (absence of any obvious migrating trend), appear to be the most distinctive features of a contourite fan. On the other hand, the lateral migration of the ‘channel-level’ geometries and the presence of erosional surfaces of limited extent and restricted to the channels, are the main diagnostic features of a distal turbidite fan. Otherwise the seismo-facies are fairly similar in both sedimentary bodies.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
