Abstract
To research the influence of seismic input method on the seismic response of traintrack-bridge system, four methods are adopted to input non-uniform seismic excitation, including direct solving method, relative motion method, large mass method and large stiffness method. Train-track-bridge dynamic analysis models under different seismic input methods are established. Taking rigid frame-continuous composite beam bridge with the span of (48+5×80+48) m as an example, the seismic responses of coupled system of train-track-bridge under different seismic input methods are compared. The results show that the seismic responses of vehicle and bridge system from large stiffness method and direct solving method are the same, derailment coefficients and the rates of wheel load reduction from large mass method are bigger than that from direct solving method, the maximum deviation reaches 44.0% and 26.4%; the derailment coefficients, the rates of wheel load reduction and bridge displacements from relative motion method are smaller than that from direct solving method with maximum deviation of 32.5%, 12.8% and 51.9% respectively. As large stiffness method only requires the input of dynamic displacement time-history, so it is more convenient than direct soling method.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.