Seismic geomorphology of buried channel systems on the New Jersey outer shelf: assessing past environmental conditions

Abstract

Quantitative geomorphologic analysis of shallowly buried, dendritic channel systems on the New Jersey shelf provides estimates of paleo-hydrologic parameters needed to link channel morphology to the former hydrodynamic setting. These channels, observed in 1–4 kHz deep-towed chirp seismic data, formed presumably as fluvial systems when the shelf was exposed during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). The presumed fluvial origin of these channels is supported by their incision into underlying Pleistocene strata, a chaotic seismic fill unit at their bases which may be indicative of non-marine gravel lag, and measured stream junction angles that are consistent with a riverine origin. The channels would also have been subjected to estuarine/tidal environments during ensuing sea-level rise. We employ empirically derived hydraulic equations for modern rivers and estuaries to estimate paleo-discharges, velocities and maximum shear stresses, using the preserved and interpolated paleo-channel geometries as a guide. Generally, trunk/main channels have box-like, symmetric cross-sections, with width/depth ratios of >100, whereas smaller, tributary channels have more v-shaped, asymmetric cross-sections with width/depth ratios of ∼40–70. The high width/depth ratios, along with low sinuosities (∼1.1) and slopes (<0.02°), are consistent with braided streams as specified by a modern river classification system. However, the channels show no evidence of braiding. We hypothesize instead that these channel systems are immature, having had insufficient time to develop high sinuosities that would otherwise be expected before they were drowned by the Holocene transgression. Mean paleo-flow estimates for these systems assuming a tidal environment (1.0–1.5 m/s) are consistent with modern tidal creeks comparable to the sizes of channels observed here (<2 km wide and <25 m deep). Estimated tidal shear stresses would be sufficient to initiate sediment transport of grains 2–8 mm in diameter (coarse sand and fine gravel) as bedload and finer grained material in suspension. However, paleo-flow estimates assuming a fluvial environment (1.1–2.0 m/s) are generally too high for a non-tidal creek, given the presumed low hydraulic gradients in this coastal plain setting. Retrodicted fluvial discharge and boundary shear stresses would have been sufficient to transport particles up to ∼15 mm in diameter (gravel) as bedload; these grain sizes are too coarse to be transported by sluggish coastal plain rivers. We conclude that either flows were quite high when this system was first incised fluvially, perhaps due to meltwater pulses following the LGM, or that tidal influences have modified the original fluvial geometry.