Abstract
Multi-span reinforced concrete (RC) curved box-girder bridges are commonly designed to facilitate traffic flow at highway interchanges. The Aksemsettin Viaduct (henceforth, A Viaduct for brevity) in Istanbul, Turkey, is an eleven-span interchange bridge with a total length of 596.8 m. Located in a high seismicity zone, the A Viaduct is designed with a curved deck, multiple bearings that have different isolation mechanisms at different bents and directions, ten rectangular columns with unequal heights, and a mix of pile foundations and spread footings. The significant length of the viaduct crossed by eleven spans also makes it susceptible to varying ground motion excitations at different foundations. To evaluate the effects of the degree of modeling detail and analysis complexity on the estimated seismic performance, the present study conducts a comprehensive fragility assessment of the specimen viaduct under various ground motion excitation schemes. First, a three-dimensional finite element model is developed with detailed simulations for the deck, columns, bearings, foundations, and abutment components. To enable different ground motion excitations at each foundation, 57 sets of spatially varying ground motions are simulated by considering the realistic surface topography and soil stratigraphy at the bridge site. Cyclic pushover analyses are performed along multiple loading directions to develop the direction-dependent capacity limit state models for hollow rectangular columns. Subsequently, a demand-capacity ratio method is utilized to develop reliable fragility models for bridge columns. Component- and system-level fragilities of the A Viaduct are then assessed under uniform versus multi-support excitations, vertical motions, and ground motions with varying incidence angles. To further capture the seismic damage discrepancies of the same components at different locations, seismic repair cost ratios of the A Viaduct are assessed when subjected to uniform and multi-support excitations. This study highlights the significance of considering multi-support excitations to achieve more realistic seismic fragility and loss estimates for multi-span long curved highway bridges.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.