Abstract
This paper aims to study the benefits of the shear links (SLs) to improve the seismic resilience of the traditional double-column tall pier after earthquakes. Therefore, a double-column tall pier with SLs was designed and compared with a conventional double-column tall pier with reinforced concrete beams (RCBs). The seismic fragility of the double-column tall piers with SLs and RCBs was evaluated using incremental dynamic analyses when subjected to far-field and near-fault ground motions. The economic losses in the life cycle between the double-column tall piers with SLs and RCBs were compared using the proposed loss assessment methodology. The results revealed that the SLs between the columns could provide additional energy dissipation to reduce the seismic damage and vulnerability of the double-column tall pier. Therefore, the double-column tall pier with SLs exhibited lower damage probability for the various damage states and fewer economic losses than the traditional double-column tall pier due to the SLs dissipating enough energy. The proposed double-column tall pier with SLs manifested more reliable seismic resilience than the conventional double-column pier with RCBs. The double-column tall pier with SLs showed a better economy in the long-term time interval. Moreover, the life cycle losses of the double-column tall pier with SLs and RCBs under the far-field ground motions are lower than those of the double-column tall pier with SLs and RCBs under the near-field ground motions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.