Abstract

This paper presents an analytical study of the seismic behavior of two different types of industrial buildings; a regular mill-type crane-supporting steel structure and an irregular heavy industrial building housing a vertical mechanical process. For both structures, the seismic response is examined through elastic time-history dynamic analyses in order to validate the predictions from the equivalent static force procedure and the response spectrum analysis method prescribed in current building codes. The analyses also serve to assess the inelastic demand in crane-supporting structure. For the crane-supporting structure, analyses are performed for sites in Montreal and Vancouver in Canada and in Seattle in the United States. The results show that the median horizontal displacement and acceleration from the time-history analyses are generally well predicted by the code analysis methods. Inelastic response in these buildings is likely to develop in the form of buckling of the lower column segment, a failure mode that exhibits limited ductility. For the tall irregular building, the analyses are performed for the Montreal site only. The results show the equivalent static method provides fair displacements estimate, but may lead to unconservative predictions of column and brace forces. Response spectrum analysis method, as prescribed in design codes, appears to provide appropriate prediction of the seismic response of such highly irregular structures. For both building types, a good prediction from response spectrum and time-history analysis methods is possible only when a sufficient number of modes are used.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call