Abstract
The maximum expected monetary benefit or minimum expected cost rule are often adopted to assess the optimum structural design levels under infrequent large earthquakes. In the assessment, the monetary benefit or cost functions are frequently established by considering the overall benefit or lifecycle cost at present value for a given structural design life. The selection of the structural design life is somewhat arbitrary, and in many cases one is interested in maximizing the structural service time or the benefit per unit service time. The consideration of the benefit (or cost) at present value per lifecycle or per unit service time may lead to different optimum design levels for a given planning time horizon. Moreover, it is unknown if the recommended importance factor in design codes to increase the seismic design load for classes of buildings is optimum. These two issues are investigated through numerical analyses by placing a structure at several different locations in Mexico and considering assembled detailed seismic hazard model. The implication of the results for the codified designs and for selecting the importance factor is discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
