Abstract

This paper presents collapse risk assessment of code-conforming reinforced concrete moment resisting frame (RC MRF) buildings located in Vancouver, Canada. This assessment investigates the three- and six-storey of regular RC MRF building systems, with and without unreinforced masonry infill wall, representing low- to mid-rise structures. These buildings are designed according to the current National Building Code of Canada and detailed based on the 2014 Canadian Standards Association A23.3 standard provision for high seismic regions. Two different ductility classes of seismic building design, namely ductile and moderately ductile, are considered to identify the capability, equality and/or difference of the seismic performance of these designed buildings. Nonlinear dynamic analysis is applied in the performance-based seismic assessment procedures to assess the collapse response of structural for the set of 50 pair ground motion records. Next, the seismic fragility curves are developed through incremental dynamic analysis. Finally, mean annual frequency of collapse is calculated through combination of fragility curve and hazard curve. The results indicate that the bare RC buildings are vulnerable to earthquake-induced collapse when the number of the story increased. The presence of the URM infill walls significantly influence the collapse behavior of the frame structure. Compared to moderately ductile MRF buildings, ductile MRF buildings show a better collapse performance, is strongly influenced by the capacity of the building system.

Highlights

  • Collapse of buildings is identified as main contribution to injuries, casualties, and economic loss from past earthquakes (Porter, 2016)

  • The presence of unreinforced masonry infill (URM) infill walls, which is normally not considered in analysis and design process, may affect the performance and risk of collapse of infilled-reinforced concrete (RC) frames in a severe earthquake to be greater or lesser than bare RC frames depending on the characteristics of URM infill walls (Mehrabi et al, 1996; Asteris et al, 2016; Sattar and Liel, 2016b)

  • The results indicate that the case study building has a 23% of P(C|Sa2/50), which is higher than value reported in Haselton et al (2011), when comparing with average value estimated from 8- to 12-story RC frame buildings [i.e., P(C|Sa2/50) = 17.5%]

Read more

Summary

Frontiers in Built Environment

With 2014 Canadian Standard Association Standard A23.3. Front. This paper presents collapse risk assessment of code-conforming reinforced concrete moment resisting frame (RC MRF) buildings located in Vancouver, Canada. This assessment investigates the three- and six-story of regular RC MRF building systems, with and without unreinforced masonry infill wall, representing low- to mid-rise structures. These buildings are designed according to the current National Building Code of Canada and detailed based on the 2014 Canadian Standards Association A23.3 standard provision for high seismic regions.

INTRODUCTION
Collapse Risk Assessment of RC Buildings
Seismic Design Procedure
Moderately ductile
Structure ID Building type
Ground Motion Selection
COLLAPSE FRAGILITY ASSESSMENT
MEAN ANNUAL FREQUENCY OF COLLAPSE
Findings
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.