Abstract

Can the brain be shifted into a different state using a simple social cue, as tests on highly hypnotizable subjects would suggest? Demonstrating an altered global brain state is difficult. Brain activation varies greatly during wakefulness and can be voluntarily influenced. We measured the complexity of electrophysiological response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in one ‘hypnotic virtuoso’. Such a measure produces a response arguably outside the subject’s voluntary control and has been proven adequate for discriminating conscious from unconscious brain states. We show that a single-word hypnotic induction robustly shifted global neural connectivity into a state where activity remained sustained but failed to ignite strong, coherent activity in frontoparietal cortices. Changes in perturbational complexity indicate a similar move towards a more segregated state. We interpret these findings to suggest a shift in the underlying state of the brain, likely moderating subsequent hypnotic responding.

Highlights

  • Hypnotic suggestions can have profound effects on behaviour and experience in some individuals, e.g. producing realisticseeming hallucinations (Oakley and Halligan 2013)

  • The temporal evolution of the Broadband phase-locking (bPL) in the hypnosis condition is characterized by a fast first peak at 50 ms, followed by a general decrease compared to baseline

  • The results show that hypnosis can be accompanied by significant changes in brain state as measured both by perturbational complexity’ index (PCI) and TMSevoked activation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hypnotic suggestions can have profound effects on behaviour and experience in some individuals, e.g. producing realisticseeming hallucinations (Oakley and Halligan 2013). At the heart of this debate is the question whether hypnosis changes the way the individual processes information. While this question is often framed by contrasting so-called state theories of hypnosis with socio-cognitive (‘non-state’) theories, this dichotomy is simplified, and hypnosis is likely best be explained by a combination of the two views (Kirsch and Lynn 1995; Kallio and Revonsuo 2003). Our aim is not to test between these two classes of theories. Our specific aim is to test whether the brain can be shifted to a fundamentally different dynamic state based on hypnotic induction

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.