Abstract

Segmentation of histopathology sections is a necessary preprocessing step for digital pathology. Due to the large variability of biological tissue, machine learning techniques have shown superior performance over conventional image processing methods. Here we present our deep neural network-based approach for segmentation and classification of glands in tissue of benign and malignant colorectal cancer, which was developed to participate in the GlaS@MICCAI2015 colon gland segmentation challenge. We use two distinct deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) for pixel-wise classification of Hematoxylin-Eosin stained images. While the first classifier separates glands from background, the second classifier identifies gland-separating structures. In a subsequent step, a figure-ground segmentation based on weighted total variation produces the final segmentation result by regularizing the CNN predictions. We present both quantitative and qualitative segmentation results on the recently released and publicly available Warwick-QU colon adenocarcinoma dataset associated with the GlaS@MICCAI2015 challenge and compare our approach to the simultaneously developed other approaches that participated in the same challenge. On two test sets, we demonstrate our segmentation performance and show that we achieve a tissue classification accuracy of 98% and 95%, making use of the inherent capability of our system to distinguish between benign and malignant tissue. Our results show that deep learning approaches can yield highly accurate and reproducible results for biomedical image analysis, with the potential to significantly improve the quality and speed of medical diagnoses.

Highlights

  • The variability of structures in biological tissue poses a challenge to both manual and automated analysis of histopathology slides (McCann et al, 2015)

  • A figure-ground segmentation based on weighted total variation produces the final segmentation result by regularizing the convolutional neural networks (CNN) predictions

  • We present both quantitative and qualitative segmentation results on the recently released and publicly available Warwick-QU colon adenocarcinoma dataset associated with the GlaS@MICCAI2015 challenge and compare our approach to the simultaneously developed other approaches that participated in the same challenge

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The variability of structures in biological tissue poses a challenge to both manual and automated analysis of histopathology slides (McCann et al, 2015). In recent years automated analysis has become a key requirement for quantitative morphology assessment and cancer grading, since tissue specimens were digitized using whole slide scanners. Andrion et al (1995) showed moderate to good agreement among five expert pathologists, and satisfactory results on their intra-observer reliability, other studies such as Thomas et al (1983) or more recently Constantini et al (2003) and Van Putten et al (2011) found that even experienced pathologists frequently disagree on tissue classification, which may lead to the conclusion that solely using expert scoring as gold standard for histopathological assessment could be insufficient (Aeffner et al, in press). There is a growing demand for robust computational methods in order to increase reproducibility of diagnoses (Gurcan et al, 2009; Dundar et al, 2011; McCann et al, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call