Abstract

Experiments are conducted to quantify leakage through a circular geomembrane (GMB) hole using two subgrades (underliners) not meeting modern filter criteria. Test results show that a 1.9- and 5.0-fold increase in hole diameter causes a 1.8- and 6.2-fold increase in leakage, respectively, whereas a 2-fold increase in GMB thickness results in an approximate 10% decrease in leakage. For a constant hydrostatic effective stress, a 2- and 3-fold increase in water head above the GMB leads to a 1.8- and 2.5-fold increase in leakage, respectively. Higher leakage arising from the intrusion of subgrade materials through the hole is quantified. A numerical model, considering the localized concentration of head loss around the hole and the consequent heterogeneity in hydraulic conductivity due to the seepage force, is presented. The percent of head loss within the hole and from the hole to any position above the GMB is independent of loading conditions and only influenced by the GMB thickness and hole diameter. Finally, empirical equations for predicting leakage through a circular GMB hole in tailings storage applications are proposed. Compared with published equations that do not consider consolidation induced heterogeneity in hydraulic conductivity, the proposed equation (which does consider these factors) gives a more accurate prediction for the cases examined.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.