Abstract

Non-domestic buildings are frequently characterised as resistant to top-down low-carbon and energy-efficiency policy. Complex relationships amongst building stakeholders are often blamed. “Middle actors”—professionals situated between policymakers and building users—can use their agency and capacity to facilitate energy and carbon decision-making from the “middle-out”. We use semi-structured interviews with expert middle actors working with schools and commercial offices, firstly, to explore their experience of energy and low-carbon decision-making in buildings and, secondly, to reflect on the evolution of middle actors’ role within it. Our exploratory findings suggest that a situated sensitivity to organisational “pressure points” can enhance middle actors’ agency and capacity to catalyse change. We find shifts in the ecology of the “middle”, as the UK’s Net Zero and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) agendas pull in new middle actors (such as the financial community) and issues (such as wellbeing and social value) to non-domestic buildings. These issues may work in reinforcing ways with organisational pressure points. Policy should capitalise on this impetus by looking beyond the physicality of individual buildings and engage with middle actors at a systemic level. This could create greater synergies with organisational concerns and strategies of building stakeholders.

Highlights

  • Non-domestic buildings are a daunting challenge to address for low-carbon policymakers

  • We focused on two particular non-domestic building sub-sectors—schools and offices—and tailored our questions to decision-making in low-carbon and energy-efficient projects in both new build and retrofit

  • In order to maximise their capacity to influence change, identifying the decisionmaking hierarchy can be the first line of approach for middle actors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Non-domestic buildings are a daunting challenge to address for low-carbon policymakers. Efforts to create new low-carbon non-domestic buildings have been subject to many varied and interrelated problems [1]. There is a need to understand this “sector” in new ways if we are to understand more about why it is so difficult to define and reach, and what lies behind its stakeholders’ choices around energy and carbon. Despite this need, stakeholder interactions and decision criteria in building energy are still under-researched [6]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.