Abstract

To prevent disease transmission, 0.05% chlorine solution is commonly recommended for handwashing in Ebola Treatment Units. In the 2014 West Africa outbreak this recommendation was widely extended to community settings, although many organizations recommend soap and hand sanitizer over chlorine. To evaluate skin irritation caused by frequent handwashing that may increase transmission risk in Ebola-affected communities, we conducted a randomized trial with 91 subjects who washed their hands 10 times a day for 28 days. Subjects used soap and water, sanitizer, or one of four chlorine solutions used by Ebola responders (calcium hypochlorite (HTH), sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC), and generated or pH-stabilized sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)). Outcomes were self-reported hand feel, irritation as measured by the Hand Eczema Score Index (HECSI) (range 0–360), signs of transmission risk (e.g., cracking), and dermatitis diagnosis. All groups experienced statistically significant increases in HECSI score. Subjects using sanitizer had the smallest increases, followed by higher pH chlorine solutions (HTH and stabilized NaOCl), and soap and water. The greatest increases were among neutral pH chlorine solutions (NaDCC and generated NaOCl). Signs of irritation related to higher transmission risk were observed most frequently in subjects using soap and least frequently by those using sanitizer or HTH. Despite these irritation increases, all methods represented minor changes in HECSI score. Average HECSI score was only 9.10 at endline (range 1–33) and 4% (4/91) of subjects were diagnosed with dermatitis, one each in four groups. Each handwashing method has benefits and drawbacks: soap is widely available and inexpensive, but requires water and does not inactivate the virus; sanitizer is easy-to use and effective but expensive and unacceptable to many communities, and chlorine is easy-to-use but difficult to produce properly and distribute. Overall, we recommend Ebola responders and communities use whichever handwashing method(s) are most acceptable, available, and sustainable for community handwashing.Trial Registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Registry ISRCTN89815514

Highlights

  • IntroductionFirst characterized following an outbreak in Zaire ( the Democratic Republic of Congo) in 1977 [1], Ebola causes severe disease and has a case fatality rate (CFR) ranging from 25–100% [2]

  • First characterized following an outbreak in Zaire in 1977 [1], Ebola causes severe disease and has a case fatality rate (CFR) ranging from 25–100% [2]

  • We investigated the impact of six recommended handwashing methods on skin irritation and dermatitis to better understand the risk that community level handwashing may pose during an Ebola outbreak

Read more

Summary

Introduction

First characterized following an outbreak in Zaire ( the Democratic Republic of Congo) in 1977 [1], Ebola causes severe disease and has a case fatality rate (CFR) ranging from 25–100% [2]. The 2014 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa was the first widespread outbreak and the largest to date. From December 2013 to Jan 2016 there have been 28,638 cases of Ebola and 11,316 deaths, mostly within West Africa and spreading to ten countries including the United States and several European nations [4]. It spread to urban areas via healthcare workers, and grew exponentially after the death of a businessman in the capital of Conakry [5]. This was the first reported introduction of Ebola into densely populated urban areas. The virus continued to persist solely through human-tohuman transmission with a dynamic and level of risk not previously seen [6,7,8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call